Does a strict liability case necessarily include an ultrahazardous activity? O A. Yes, because ultrahazardous activities are strict liability claims.
O B. Yes, because strict liability is based on fault.
O C. No, because it may include a defective product.
D. No, because an ultrahazardous activity is a negligence action.

A i think

Explanation:

"Under the original Common Law, strict liability was applied if an action was “ultra-hazardous” An activity was deemed “ultra-hazardous” if it necessarily involved a risk of serious harm to the person, land or property of another person that could not be eliminated by the exercise of even the utmost care."

on lawself.com

answer:

c

explanation:

ignoring them will make them stay away.

answer: it could be in all the same frase but if i want to be anyone here in the

same room the sumbiyt

explanation:

i find it more easry on the last too groups of peole and the legem imfortmation that i plot to do so