subject
Law, 12.10.2021 15:30 ctyrector

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate? explain your reasoning

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 04.07.2019 09:10
How can an environmental law affect a business
Answers: 1
question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Cases that arent resloved through plea bargaining or by a jury trial are decided by a judge in a \an a.indicmentb.grand jury.c.arraignment d. bentch trial
Answers: 3
question
Law, 07.07.2019 08:10
Question 1: for those students who do not take traffic school, which of the following is true? . they are 75% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident! . they are 10% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 24% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 75% more likely to have an accident - they are 5% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 75% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 16% more likely to have an accident - they are 50% more likely to get a traffic ticket, 5% more likely to be involved in an accident, and 24% more likely to have an accident
Answers: 1
question
Law, 12.07.2019 10:10
What techniques do you use to come to a smooth stop? (driver's education)
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or...
Questions
question
English, 20.08.2019 17:00
question
Mathematics, 20.08.2019 17:00
question
History, 20.08.2019 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722363