Define reasonable suspicion searches (i. e. Terry v. Ohio) and discuss the pros and cons of permitting searches of individuals who are not suspected of a crime. Do you think that public safety is a compelling interest that can negate an individual's right to privacy or are these searches a violation of the individual's constitutional rights? Support your response.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment refer the attachment for the question " do you think that public safety is a compelling interest that can negate an individual's right to privacy or are these searches a violation of the individual's constitutional rights

"Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard of proof in United States law that is less than probable cause, the legal standard for arrests and warrants, but more than an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or 'hunch'"; it must be based on "specific and articulable facts", "taken together with rational inferences from

on june 23, 1972, the president signed title ix of the education amendments of 1972, 20 u.s.c. into law. title ix is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.

answer:

"it is often classified as either a schedule ii or schedule iii substance, making it illegal to possess for personal use or distribution. crystal meth can be ingested, injected, or smoked. it is a highly addictive substance and can lead to many different personal, medical, and legal problems."

this is the link

hope your friend dont get in trouble