Khá và Bảnh là vợ chồng, do ghen tuông, cho rằng Bảnh đã phản bội mình trong hôn nhân. Khá đã bỏ thuốc độc vào cốc nước rồi bảo Bảnh uống. Thấy Bảnh giãy giụa kêu đau bụng nhưng Khá vẫn để mặc, coi như không thấy gì. Kết quả Bảnh chết. Hỏi có vi phạm pháp luật trong trường hợp trên không? Vì sao? Phân tích cấu thành vi phạm pháp luật nếu có?

Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.