Law, 22.07.2021 19:30 villarrealc1987

A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives. While still in State A, the plaintiff's auto was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant, a citizen of State B. The plaintiff suffered personal injuries and damage to his vehicle amounting to approximately $90,000. The plaintiff filed suit in the federal district court for State A and obtained proper service of process on the defendant. Under the laws of State A, the driver of a vehicle that strikes another vehicle in the rear is presumed to have acted negligently, regardless of the surrounding circumstances. Neither the law of State B nor the federal statutes or case law has adopted such a rule. Should the court apply the presumption in question

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Law

Law, 10.07.2019 07:10

Which of the following is a polynomial with roots 3,5i, and -5if(x)=x^3-3x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-25f(x)=x^3-15x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-75

Answers: 2

Answer

Law, 11.07.2019 05:20

Vehicle #1 skidded 50 ft before impact with a drag factor of 0.80, how far from impact was vehicle #1 when vehicle #2 first began to accelerate from being stopped?

Answers: 2

Answer

Law, 15.07.2019 22:40

How has the sentence for felony murder for minors changed over time?

Answers: 1

Answer

Law, 16.07.2019 02:30

You find a body in a kitchen with undigested eggs and bacon in its stomach. knowing the victim had a set routine they followed most mornings, what would you then check to most narrow in on the time of death? what time the victim’s alarm clock was set to that morning what time the victim goes to work that morning what time the victim usually ate breakfast what time the victim usually took a shower in the morning.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

A plaintiff who was a citizen of State A was traveling to adjoining State B to visit his relatives....

Questions