subject
Law, 16.07.2021 17:40 bella2017

A car driver was hit by a pickup truck driver and suffered severe injuries. The car driver properly sued the truck driver in federal court for negligence, based on diversity jurisdiction, claiming the truck driver ran a red light. The truck driver defended on the grounds that the car driver was contributorily negligent for speeding, which under the applicable law would completely bar the car driver's claim. The case went to trial, where all issues were vigorously litigated by the parties. The jury returned a verdict for the truck driver, specifically finding that the car driver was negligent for speeding. Thereafter, a passenger who was riding with the truck driver filed a diversity claim for negligence in federal court against the car driver for personal injuries from the same accident. The passenger wants to preclude the car driver from relitigating the question of whether the car driver was negligent. How will the court likely rule

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 12.07.2019 10:10
What techniques do you use to come to a smooth stop? (driver's education)
Answers: 1
question
Law, 15.07.2019 22:40
How has the sentence for felony murder for minors changed over time?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 14:10
Which of the following is not a potential distraction that could negatively impact your fitness to drive? a. passengers b. technology c. emotions d. traffic lights
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A car driver was hit by a pickup truck driver and suffered severe injuries. The car driver properly...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 24.04.2020 22:20
question
Geography, 24.04.2020 22:20
Questions on the website: 13722362