Which of the following is not a goal of the interrogation process? to provide information for use by prosecutors in possible court action
to obtain a conviction of the person suspected of committing the crime
to gather information that enables investigators to arrive at logical conclusions
to obtain an admission of guilt from the person suspected of committing the crime

I believe the answer is B. To obtain a conviction of the person suspected of committing the crime.

Explanation:

While the ultimate goal of an interrogation would be for it to lead to a conviction of a person suspected of committing a crime, that is not the present goal of an interrogation. Additionally, an interrogation suspect might be innocent so a interrogator should not be entering an interrogation looking to force a conviction.

i think it can have both positive and negative effects on businesses.

for example:

lets say you own a small business and taxes go up 4% that means it is going to cost your business more money to buy product to sell. but at the same time you make more money from the tax rise.

that is my theory.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.