Law, 04.07.2021 09:50 jurnee77

DUE TODAY, PLEASE HELP. GHB Sdn Bhd, a construction company, wanted to buy a piece of land. The company promised to pay Sandhu a 3% commission if Sandhu could assist the company to purchase a 10-acre plot of land in Damansara. The land has been eyed by the company as a potential location for the next housing project. Sandhu told Ahmad, the managing director of the company, that the land was in high demand and that other potential buyers were also interested. Ahmad told Sandhu that if he was successtul in acquiring the land through his negotiation skills and by olering an increased price, Sandhu would be paid 0.5% as an extra commission. 1his promise was made when both were playing golt. Sandhu did the works and completed the purchase of the land for GHB Sdn Bhd. The 3% commission was duly paid to Sandhu but the company refused to pay the additional 0.5% commission. sandhu alleged that Ahmad had made him an ofter to pay the extra commission with an intention to be bound by legal relations and that Sandhu had accepted that offer Intormation from Ahmad' s secretary indicated that Ahmad did not remember that he ever made the promise of the extra commission. He suffered from an occasional memory lapse where he received treatment tor an early dementia. Ahmad said even if he made the promise, he had not intended to be legally bound by such an extravagant promise in which 0.5%% was equivalent to RM2 Million in the deal. Ahmad also asserted that the promise would have beerh made in the company's meeting room and in writing if it was meant as a serious legal undertaking. Based on the three elements of contract which are intention to create legal relation, capacity and consideration, advise Sandhu if there is any prospect for him to recover the extra commission as promised. (15 marks)

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Law

Law, 10.07.2019 04:40

Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.

Answers: 1

Answer

Law, 13.07.2019 16:10

If the light is green as you approach an intersection, you should: a. cover your brakes b. expect it to change soon c. speed up to enter the intersection

Answers: 1

Answer

Law, 16.07.2019 17:20

Which best describes the basis for the right to privacy in the united states? a. the right to privacy is a civil liberty that places limits on government power through the constitution, especially the bill of rights. b. in griswold v. connecticut, the supreme court defined the right to privacy by incorporating the fourth amendment and the right of people to be secure; the self-incrimination clause of the fifth amendment; the ninth amendment; and the due process clause of the 14th amendment. c. the right to privacy is embodied in the words of u.s. justice louis brandeis, "the right to be left alone." d. the term privacy is not in the constitution or bill or rights but it does exist.

Answers: 1

Answer

Law, 16.07.2019 18:30

Which statement best explains why article iii of the constitution gives congress the ability to create lower courts inferior to the supreme court "from time to time”? a.the framers of the constitution believed that as the country grew, more courts would be needed to meet its needs. b.the framers of the constitution believed that as courts made unpopular decisions, they would need to be replaced. c.the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that congress always had more power than the courts. d.the framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that new courts were always being created so new judges could be appointed.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

DUE TODAY, PLEASE HELP. GHB Sdn Bhd, a construction company, wanted to buy a piece of land. The comp...

Questions