14-year-old T was riding a motorbike without a helmet, was stopped by the traffic police and issued a penalty decision, thinking that T was not old enough to use a motorbike (according to regulations, people aged 16 years old can machine ) should not be administratively sanctioned. Is that opinion right or wrong. How does the law stipulate the age for handling administrative violations for minors who violate the law on social security, order and safety but are not criminals?

The Opinion Is Totally Wrong.

Explanation:

A person who is at least 14 years of age may apply for a restricted

license to operate a motor-driven cycle only. Under Alabama law, a

moped is considered a motor-driven cycle. The parent of guardian of

any child shall not authorize or knowingly permit the child to violate

any provision of the code regulating the operation of motorcycles or

motor-driven cycles.

Once a 14-year-old is licensed to operate a motor-driven cycle, the

license is valid for a four-year period for that class vehicle. The “Class

M” must appear on the license in order to operate the cycle. Restriction

“B” (motor-driven cycle - 5 horsepower or smaller - for ages 14 and 15

only) will then apply. At age 16, the applicant may return to the driver

license examining office and transfer to a motorcycle class license

without the size restrictions.

I hope it may help You!

the first part of the statute of limitations is the standard deadline, which gives victims of medical malpractice a certain number of years -- usually anywhere from two to six years, depending on the state -- after the malpractice occurred within which to file a lawsuit.

i dont think so i think its more a lot of people i know failed the first time

explanation: