subject
Law, 06.05.2021 20:40 tresajacko4931

Grandpa Ted is 95 years old. He recently went to his great-grandson's wedding and decided he could keep up with the young whipper snappers and did 15 shots of whiskey. Grandpa Ted was incredibly intoxicated but managed to stumble out to his car and attempt to drive home. Grandpa Ted passed out two blocks away and crashed his car into the telephone pole. What would be the appropriate charge for Grandpa Ted? no​

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:20
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. b. taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. c. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out. d. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
question
Law, 17.07.2019 04:20
In order to protect trade secrets, particularly formulas, it is wise to apply for a patent. choose answer (a) if this statement is true or (b) if this statement is false
Answers: 3
question
Law, 19.07.2019 07:10
During 2016 most pedestrian fatalities occurred between the hours of what
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Grandpa Ted is 95 years old. He recently went to his great-grandson's wedding and decided he could k...
Questions
question
History, 06.01.2020 18:31
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2020 18:31
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2020 18:31
Questions on the website: 13722367