FORUM DESCRIPTION Is it fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety? Do we need to consider other issues to determ

the U. S. corrections system is too large? What might some of those reasons be? Are they more important than money?

It is fair that financial pressures determine how much will be spent to promote justice and public safety. The consequences of the correction system must be taken into account to determine whether this system is too large. These consequences are more important than money.

This also promotes social justice, as it promotes a decrease in inequality in the country.

Regarding social justice, we can say that the correction system is very large and it spends a lot of public money, but we cannot ignore that the consequences of this system are much greater and cause very positive effects on society, which are more important than public spending.

More information on social inequality at the link:

link

No, it is not fair to let financial pressures determine how much we are willing to spend to promote justice and public safety.

Explanation:

No, it is not appropriate to let financial pressures ascertain how much we are willing to contribute to promoting justice and public security.

Spending on justice and public safety is an essential public expense, an expense that is needed to maintain the composition of our enlightened society. Let’s consider the example of a correctional institution. Such an institution works towards the restoration of offenders. These institutions have to struggle with unlawful justice bureaus for funding. They also have to struggle with social welfare divisions like education for funding.

Now correctional bureaus help in advancing justice and public safety. If funding is freed from the restraints of financial pressures then these bureaus will be necessary for supporting public security and supporting justice.

answer:

c it's motivated by the needs of the patient.