Case 4.3 highlights the case of Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L. P. review the issue of this case after you read the opinion. Was the appellate court correct in this ruling? Why? What was the defense that was offered by the respondent (and alternate term for defendant; another term is litigant, which can be used for both the plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff may also be called the claimant)? Do you think that the ruling would have been different if indeed, it did involve a minor rather than an adult? What might be the ramification if spectators could recover damages for injuries that are sustained at sporting events?