HELP I NEED THIS ANSWER ASAP What argument best responds to citizens who do not vote because they feel that no political candidates speak for them?

A. Voting is the only way one qualifies to run for office, which is necessary to replace incumbent candidates.

B. Voting will help candidates reflect citizens' interests.

C. Voting often makes no difference, so citizens should run for public office themselves.

D. Political parties will learn from the low voter turnout how to better please voters

D

Explanation:

I would say D because not most votes rely on citizens. Even though they so like to have citizens vote so they can now who the state would rather have to run. But D is best answer because the political parties want voters to vote so they want to do all they can to please the citizens and have them vote. :) I hope this helps

more people will not obey the law or vice vice versa

explanation: the answer really speaks for itself if the number of prisoners are going up then that means that more people will not obey the law and if less people are going to prison then that means that more people are obeying the law.

answer: it could be in all the same frase but if i want to be anyone here in the

same room the sumbiyt

explanation:

i find it more easry on the last too groups of peole and the legem imfortmation that i plot to do so