One who engages in categorical moral thinking is likely to approach the trolley car case by focusing on: a) Whether the trolley car driver can maximize the number of lives saved by diverting the trolley. b) Whether the trolley car driver can minimize the amount of suffering by diverting the trolley. c) Whether diverting the trolley car leads to the best consequences. d) Whether more people are made happy if the trolley car is diverted. e) Whether diverting the trolley car would violate people's rights. unanswered

The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, it must be destroyed immediately. cannot be admitted into consideration. can be admitted into court anyway. cannot be admitted into court unless a judge agrees.

Issues involveing police searches are adressed in the amendment to the constitution a.sixth b.fourth.c.eighth d.fifth

John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-¿what responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?