A lighthearted article in the New England Journal of Medicine noted that there is a strong relationship between the per capita consumption of chocolate in a given nation and the number of Nobel Prize winners produced by that nation. One conclusion readily presents itself: People who consume more chocolate are smarter, and therefore national populations that consume more chocolate produce more Nobel winners. But how else could this relationship be interpreted? Be precise, be skeptical, look at the evidence, and offer some alternative interpretations.

answer:

"it is often classified as either a schedule ii or schedule iii substance, making it illegal to possess for personal use or distribution. crystal meth can be ingested, injected, or smoked. it is a highly addictive substance and can lead to many different personal, medical, and legal problems."

this is the link

hope your friend dont get in trouble

cluck cluck?   plz give me brainlest xd

answer:

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me. and that is just nasty!

explanation:

answer:

yea

explanation:

mhm ur welcome