Law, 29.07.2020 20:01 tyryceschnitker
A potential expert witness made an oral agreement with a plaintiff's attorney to testify on behalf of the plaintiff for $60,000 . However, after receiving the money the witness backed out and would not testify or pay back the money. The witness claimed that the plaintiff could not sue them because the oral contract was with the lawyer, not the plaintiff. Yet, the plaintiff claimed that she was a 3rd party beneficiary to the contract. The court made a landmark decision regarding expert witness and 3rd party beneficiary case law. What do you think the surprising decision was in this case? Why do you think that?
Answers: 3
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Within how many days of acquiring or discovering a significant financial interest is the investigator required to submit an updated disclosure to the institution?
Answers: 3
Law, 08.07.2019 06:10
How has naturalization made an impact or change in society, government, and the political process?
Answers: 3
Law, 10.07.2019 04:40
Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.
Answers: 1
A potential expert witness made an oral agreement with a plaintiff's attorney to testify on behalf o...
Chemistry, 12.01.2020 05:31
Physics, 12.01.2020 05:31
Mathematics, 12.01.2020 05:31
Biology, 12.01.2020 05:31
Mathematics, 12.01.2020 05:31
Physics, 12.01.2020 05:31
Mathematics, 12.01.2020 05:31
Biology, 12.01.2020 05:31
Mathematics, 12.01.2020 05:31
Spanish, 12.01.2020 05:31