How are judicial activism and judicial review related?

A. Judicial activism defines how to interpret judicial review of constitutional law.

B. Judicial review is the underlying legal principle in judicial activism.

C. Judicial review defines the process of judicial activism in constitutional disputes

D. Judicial activism is the legal principle that defines the ability for judges to review cases.

The correct answer would most likely be A.

Explanation:

Because while judicial review mean to decide if the law/act is consistent with constitution. On the other hand judicial activism is more of a behavioral concept of the judge concerned...What im trying to say is that With the power of judicial review, the courts act as a custodian of fundamental rights

i dont think so i think its more a lot of people i know failed the first time

explanation:

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.