Law, 19.05.2020 00:58 nelyanariba981p555ve
1. The function of a school is to teach the curriculum. Students in academic classes could have been distracted from their lessons by the armbands. The school district has a legitimate interest in ensuring that instruction remains the focus of classrooms and, to that end, acted within appropriate authority to prohibit the armbands.
2. Public schools are part of the state government. The 14th Amendment protects people from state infringement of their First Amendment rights to free speech.
3. Wearing the armbands was a form of speech. It was a silent, passive expression of opinion.
4. Schools are meant to act as an environment for discourse and a forum for different ideas; allowing students the ability to express their ideals is an inevitable part of the educational process.
5. Free speech is not an absolute right. The First Amendment does not say that anyone may say anything, at any place, at any time. Schools are not an appropriate forum for protest.
6. The Vietnam War is a controversial issue. Wearing the armbands could be an explosive situation that disrupts learning. It is the school districtâs duty to prevent substantial and serious disruption to the learning environment.
7. Students, whether in school or out of school, are âpersonsâ under the Constitution. They possess fundamental rights that all levels of government must respect.
8. Voicing controversial opinions in class or in school areas such as the hallways, lunchrooms, and gym classes may lead to bullying or violence directed against the protesting students. It is the responsibility of the schools to prevent such behavior and protect the safety of all students.
9. The studentsâ speech was not disruptive. The school district gave no evidence that the armbands were a distraction or disrupted the learning process. Just because the schools were afraid that there might be a disruption is not enough to infringe studentsâ speech.
10. The students wearing the armbands did not infringe any other studentâs rights. Wearing the armbands did not intrude upon the work of the schools, teachers, or other students.
11. The school district did not ban all types of expressions, just the armbands. They were banned because of their inflammatory nature and potential for significant disruption. Students could still express opinions in other ways. For example, they could wear political emblems such as âVote for Candidate Xâ buttons.
12. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the children, it would be overstepping its bounds and interfering with state and local government powers that govern day-to-day school operations.
Answers: 3
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb.
Answers: 2
Law, 06.07.2019 21:10
Criminal liability consists of three elements. what is the correct ordering of these elements for the purposes of determining liability?
Answers: 3
Law, 08.07.2019 03:10
John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-Âżwhat responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?
Answers: 2
Law, 11.07.2019 05:30
"magic" mushrooms have effects similar to those of a. lsd b. pcp c. ketamine d. none of the above
Answers: 1
1. The function of a school is to teach the curriculum. Students in academic classes could have been...
English, 12.07.2019 21:00
Physics, 12.07.2019 21:00
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 21:00
History, 12.07.2019 21:00
History, 12.07.2019 21:00
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 21:00
Social Studies, 12.07.2019 21:00
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 21:00
Geography, 12.07.2019 21:00
Mathematics, 12.07.2019 21:00
Business, 12.07.2019 21:00
Business, 12.07.2019 21:00