Write a brief summary (one paragraph each of 3-5 sentences) of the New Jersey v. T. L.O. and Vernonia v. Acton cases.

How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?

What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?

Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!)

anticipatory breach of contract

as the name suggests, an anticipatory breach is a breach of contract before the time of performance. so, if a promisor denies to perform his promise and signifies his unwillingness before the time for performance, then it is an anticipatory breach of contract.

and

actual breach of contract

while an anticipatory breach is before the time of performance, an actual breach of contract is on the scheduled time of performance of the contract. an actual breach of contract can be committed either.

hope this . : )

quid pro quo sexual harassment typically involves an employee being pressured by a superior to provide sexual favors in order to avoid being fired or demoted, or in order to get a promotion, raise or perk.

keep quite, set up,sorry