Look up the following case and answer the following questions:

1. What are the key facts of the case? (What events led up to the case going to court?)

2. What legal questions need to be determined?

3. What did the court decide and why?

UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOY TRUCK LINES, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 237 F.3d 1331; 2001 U. S. App. LEXIS 562; 57 U. S.P. Q.2D (BNA) 1380

Yvonne finds a carpenter to do some repairs for her house and tells him that if he finishes the job by saturday she will pay him 1000. yvonne offer creates an blank contract

Beth is a victim of carl’s violation of a criminal law. criminal law is concerned with

Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.