subject
Law, 13.03.2020 02:01 andrewblack033

Roberto foi preso em flagrante pela suposta participação no delito de furto de uma bicicleta. Na lavratura do respectivo auto, foram ouvidos os policiais responsáveis pela prisão e o indiciado. A prisão em flagrante foi convertida em prisão preventiva em sede de audiência de custódia. Concluídas as investigações e relatado o inquérito policial, os autos foram encaminhados ao Ministério Público. Ao analisar o caso, no entanto, o Promotor de Justiça entendeu haver diligência imprescindível para o oferecimento da denúncia, consistente na oitiva da vítima proprietária da bicicleta, eis que Roberto disse ter com ela negociado a compra do referido objeto. Nesse caso, deverá o Promotor de Justiça

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 14.07.2019 13:10
Sonja is writing an essay about becoming a preschool teacher. complete it by correctly filling in the missing information. out of all the career choices in the career cluster, i'd like to be a preschool teacher. i love working with children, and i think it would be a rewarding career in which i could create lessons and the students prepare socially and academically for kindergarten. in order to become a preschool teacher, i'll need to complete high school and it'll also be important to work on my creativity, interpersonal, and organizational skills. i know that when i work hard to complete the academic requirements, i'll be prepared for the career path that interests me most.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 06:20
What does a double solid white line mean?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 19:20
What is the constitution of the united states
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Roberto foi preso em flagrante pela suposta participação no delito de furto de uma bicicleta. Na lav...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 15:50
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 15:50
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 15:50
question
English, 27.04.2021 15:50
question
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 15:50
Questions on the website: 13722367