A cyclist filed a negligence action in federal court in State A against a driver following an accident. After a jury of 12 persons returned a verdict for the cyclist, the presiding judge on her own motion, polled the jurors individually. The judge's polling revealed that the jury was not unanimous in
deciding that the cyclist had exercised due care and was not guilty of contributory negligence. As a result, the judge ordered a new trial. The cyclist then filed a timely notice of appeal.
Which, if any, of the following arguments would win on appeal?
The court of appeals should dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (Civil Procedure-Appealability and Review)
Answers: 1
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Within how many days of acquiring or discovering a significant financial interest is the investigator required to submit an updated disclosure to the institution?
Answers: 3
Law, 06.07.2019 21:10
Yvonne finds a carpenter to do some repairs for her house and tells him that if he finishes the job by saturday she will pay him 1000. yvonne offer creates an blank contract
Answers: 1
Law, 07.07.2019 11:10
What is one form of speech that is not protected by the u.s. constitution? a. speech about religion b. political speech about a candidate c. speech protesting the government d. speech that is slanderous
Answers: 1
Law, 13.07.2019 16:10
Frequently, two expressways that intersect will be connected by a . a. cloverleaf interchange b. diamond interchange c. trumpet interchange
Answers: 1
A cyclist filed a negligence action in federal court in State A against a driver following an accide...
World Languages, 27.07.2021 14:00
English, 27.07.2021 14:00
English, 27.07.2021 14:00
English, 27.07.2021 14:00
Social Studies, 27.07.2021 14:00
English, 27.07.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 27.07.2021 14:00
English, 27.07.2021 14:00
English, 27.07.2021 14:00
Business, 27.07.2021 14:00
Social Studies, 27.07.2021 14:00
History, 27.07.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 27.07.2021 14:00
History, 27.07.2021 14:00