subject
Law, 14.02.2020 03:28 weeblordd

Uhrhahn Construction prepared proposals for work on construction projects for Lamar and Joan Hopkins. The Hopkinses signed the proposals for each project under sections titled “Acceptance of
Proposal.” The proposals stated that any changes to the written estimates and specifications had to be in writing. During the construction, the Hopkinses made several oral requests for additional work not
included in the proposals. They paid for some of them after receiving invoices labeled change orders for such work. When they did not pay for the rest, Uhrhahn sued, alleging there was an implied contract
to make oral changes. Was there such an implied contract? Justify your position.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 18:10
What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 06.07.2019 11:10
Vop hearing iowa 2 tec violation discharge date expired tho can they send me to jail?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 09.07.2019 05:20
How does henry’s statement reflect the idea of social contract? how does the idea of social contract protect people’s natural and individual rights
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 03:10
What do floor leaders in congress do
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Uhrhahn Construction prepared proposals for work on construction projects for Lamar and Joan Hopkins...
Questions
question
Business, 02.01.2020 21:31
Questions on the website: 13722359