In the case of miller v. ratner, the maryland court upheld the prohibition against claims for: breach of promise to marry. true or false?

TRUE

Explanation:

Lonnie Miller and Warren Ratner started dating in 1990 and both of them lives together in Ratner’s apartment.  Lonnie sued that her boyfriend forced her out of the apartment after living with him for three years with a promise that she will be married by Ratner. She further stated that this came up because she was diagnosed with breast cancer.

The Court of Special Appeals upheld a Montgomery County Circuit Court stance on dismissing the appeal on the basis of ‘breach of promise to marry’, citing that the clause has long be abolished over decades ago by the legislature. and should not be subject for debate.

quid pro quo sexual harassment typically involves an employee being pressured by a superior to provide sexual favors in order to avoid being fired or demoted, or in order to get a promotion, raise or perk.