What is the discriminator used by the court to determine whether proper due care and due diligence was performed by an organization?
a. best business practice

b. law of averages

c. prudent man rule

d. annualized loss expectancy calculations

Option C is correct

Explanation:

This is a legal maxim placing restriction on allowable discretion when dealing with a clients accounts to types of investment that a prudent person seeking reasonable income would buy for himself.

so you come to the correct conclusions and make the right decision based on good judgment and a clear mind and valid thought processes behind it, and not just hasty thinking and recklessness.

explanation:

hey love i hoped this if it didn't let me know. you so much and have a wonderful day : ) keep doing the very best you can and never give up you can do it

the first part of the statute of limitations is the standard deadline, which gives victims of medical malpractice a certain number of years -- usually anywhere from two to six years, depending on the state -- after the malpractice occurred within which to file a lawsuit.