When scholars and justices interpret the constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to

When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.

Explanation:

The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.

By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.

so you come to the correct conclusions and make the right decision based on good judgment and a clear mind and valid thought processes behind it, and not just hasty thinking and recklessness.

explanation:

hey love i hoped this if it didn't let me know. you so much and have a wonderful day : ) keep doing the very best you can and never give up you can do it

try c

explanation:

because health care was someone else i think