After reading the synopsis of taylor v. baseball club of seattle, l. p., 130 p.3d 835 (wash. ct. app. 2006) in your textbook, discuss the following as posed in the critical thinking section after the case: question 1: would the result in this case have been different if taylor’s minor son, rather than taylor herself, had been struck by the ball? should courts apply the doctrine of assumption of risk to children? what factors would be important in your analysis.