What are everyone's thoughts on united states v. jones? do you agree? let's say a government ruling said they could monitor everyone 24/7 via tracking devices, phone data, etc. wouldn't that be good for law-abiding citizens and stop criminals. this isn't a question from school or a test i'm just curious about someone else thoughts. i only see criminals being against monitoring, since they have something to hide.

If you cannot see clearly around your car 100 ft in all directions as you approach an intersection, you should: a. make sure you're driving in the center lane b. reduce your speed to 15 mph c. wait to turn until the next intersection

The mirror check may involve a. checking that you can see your tires in the mirror b. realigning the mirrors once you get seated c. reinstalling the mirrors every few months d. applying a new layer of anti-glare spray

Which best describes the basis for the right to privacy in the united states? a. the right to privacy is a civil liberty that places limits on government power through the constitution, especially the bill of rights. b. in griswold v. connecticut, the supreme court defined the right to privacy by incorporating the fourth amendment and the right of people to be secure; the self-incrimination clause of the fifth amendment; the ninth amendment; and the due process clause of the 14th amendment. c. the right to privacy is embodied in the words of u.s. justice louis brandeis, "the right to be left alone." d. the term privacy is not in the constitution or bill or rights but it does exist.