subject
Law, 05.09.2019 21:30 bryantpropst1395

Two parents purchased a new mobile home from a seller. the mobile home was manufactured by mobilco and had a ventilating system designed by mobilco with both a heating unit and an air conditioner. mobilco installed a furnace manufactured by heatco and an air conditioning unit manufactured by coolco. each was controlled by an independent thermostat installed by mobilco. because of the manner in which mobilco designed the ventilating system, the first time the ventilating system was operated by the parents, cold air was vented into the parents' bedroom to keep the temperature at 68 degrees f (20 degrees c). the cold air then activated the heater thermostat, and hot air was pumped into the bedroom of the six-month-old child of the parents. the temperature in the child's room reached more than 170 degrees f (77 degrees c) before the child's mother became aware of the condition and shut the system off manually. as a result, the child suffered permanent physical injury. claims have been asserted by the child, through a duly appointed guardian, against mobilco, the seller, heatco, and coolco. if the child's claim against the seller is based on negligence, the minimum proof necessary to establish the seller's liability is that the ventilating systema. was defective. b. was defective and had not been inspected by the seller. c. was defective and had been inspected by the seller, and the defect was not discovered. d. was defective, and the defect would have been discovered if the seller had exercised reasonable care in inspecting the system.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 16:10
How would you answer this question. how could you build your practice as an educator for equity, diversity, and inclusion to avoid the oppression of marginalized populations of students?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 10.07.2019 04:40
Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
question
Law, 16.07.2019 20:50
What body has the power to ratify treaties
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Two parents purchased a new mobile home from a seller. the mobile home was manufactured by mobilco a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 16:43
question
Biology, 05.05.2020 16:43
Questions on the website: 13722360