True or false: in schenck v. u. s., the supreme court ruled that the espionage act was unconstitutional.

The correct answer is false.

It is false that in Schenck v. U.S., the Supreme Court ruled that the Espionage Act was unconstitutional.

What the United States Supreme Court ruled on this case was that freedom of speech could be suppressed or limited if it represented a risk for the national security of the country. The decision was made on March 3, 1991.

The context is that the United States decided to enter World War I, and the government passed the Espionage Act that prohibited any act against the United States' interests and any action that favored the enemy.

answer: if you like this comment you are my freind

explanation:

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.