Read this passage: a group that opposes immigration hires a lobbyist to approach members of congress on its behalf. the lobbyist secretly pays a senator to vote against a law that would allow more refugees into the country. what possible disadvantage of interest groups does this scenario illustrate

The scenario describes the sensitive line that distances the lobby from corruption. The lobby is legalized in the US, which allows individual interest groups to be allowed to defend their interests with congressmen.

However, when there is a money transfer to the politician, a crime of corruption is set up because lobby agents are buying a public decision. This is very serious because it goes beyond the bounds of the law, giving lobbyists an illegal advantage in the political decision-making process.

Politics is an activity that involves different interests, that is, it is a correlation of forces where hardly all citizens are satisfied. In the case described, citizens in favor of immigration are clearly disadvantaged.

They sometimes resort to unethical tactics.

Explanation:

(Apex)

montesquieu took the view that the roman republic had powers separated so that no one could usurp complete power. in the british constitutional system, montesquieu discerned a separation of powers among the monarch, parliament, and the courts of law.

it the big letter b heart my answer