Answer needed asap plz the warren court ruled that a state law forbidding the sale of birth control was a. unconstitutional because it violated the freedom of speech. b. constitutional because it related to the right to religious freedom. c. unconstitutional because it violated the right to privacy. d. constitutional because health care is a service, not a right.

The correct answer is C.

First of all, when speaking about the Warren Court we refer to the US Supreme Court during the period in which Earl Warren was the Chief Justice (1953-1969).

The question speaks about the Griswold v. Connecticut case from 1965. This case is a reference in the US, concerning the legal regulations about contraceptive measures. The case analyzed a law from Conneticut which prohibited the use of drugs or medicine to avoid conception.

The court declared the law unconstitutional, because it meant a violation of the "right of marital privacy" and also contributed to deny citizens, specially those from socioeconomic disadvantaged situations, the access to proper methods of birth control.

affirmative action refers to the policies that take gender, race, or ethnicity into account in order to promote equal opportunity.

employers subject to title vii are prohibited from taking race or sex into account in any employment decisions. aa is a penalty for having any job group substantially statistically "underutilized" in any race or either sex. the employer must take steps to eliminate the underutilization, then stop, ending its aa efforts