Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources? a. oversimplifications do not make any kind of historical argument. b. oversimplifications rely on claims of value rather than claims of fact. c. oversimplifications are usually too similar to existing historical arguments. d. oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence.

D. Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence.

Explanation:

Historians should avoid over simplification as such because it often ignores complex or contradictory evidence.

Historians are saddled with the responsibility of trying to understand and decipher the past in order to predict the future.

In doing this, different sources are usually employed in studies. Primary and secondary sources of information can be quite challenging to comprehend and place in historical terms.

Oversimplification often tends to makes things to simple and distort the information they convey.

This procedure distorts history since it tends to ignore complex evidences that are not straightforward.

consider an orange peel: if you want to try and lay it flat, you have to stretch it, we know exactly how things are being stretched or squashed at any given point. we have many different map projections because each has different patterns of some projections can even preserve certain features of the earth without