subject
History, 26.08.2019 02:20 Shom2095

Was the declaration of independence intended to be a formal declaration of war? why or why not? a. yes. though fighting preceded the writing, it was intended to be a formal declaration of war. b. no. the war started a year before the declaration of independence was written. c. yes. the declaration of independence formally united the militias of the individual colonies. d. no. there was no need to declare war, as this power had yet to be established.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Review the territory. all land from the bighorn mountains down to south dakota territory. what happened to this territory as a result of the treaty of fort laramie in 1868? it was confiscated by the us government, as a consequence for the battle of the little bighorn. it was given to the us government by the lakota sioux, who got reservation lands in exchange. it was gifted by the us government to the lakota sioux, who viewed it as a sacred place. it was allocated for lakota sioux to settle, but the us government maintained mining rights.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Why did benjamin martin not vote for south carolina to start a militia
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Why was the tea tax seen as a reprehensible to the people of boston ?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
The maya got water from which of the following sources?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Was the declaration of independence intended to be a formal declaration of war? why or why not? a....
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.01.2020 00:31
question
Health, 06.01.2020 00:31
Questions on the website: 13722361