subject
History, 01.08.2019 05:00 jkirby29

"it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. if two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each." —chief justice john marshall, 1803 which conclusion can be drawn from this excerpt of the supreme court's decision in marbury v. madison? a) the jurisdiction granted to the judicial branch is limited to federal and constitutional laws. b) this decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the judicial branch. c) this decision gave congress the authority to charter the national bank, which angered the anti-federalists. d) this decision strengthened the "elastic clause" of the u. s. constitution and expanded the powers of congress.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:00
Which territory controlled by hitler stretches is the farthest east
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
In ohio in 1872, the cleveland massacre was a)a violent labor dispute at standard oil refineries in cleveland. b)a takeover by standard oil of the refineries in cleveland. c)an attempt to stop standard oil from becoming a monopoly. d)a failed attempt by standard oil to take over other refineries.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:20
Who proposed the pudding model and what does it say about the structure of the atom
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 15:40
How does a bill become a law in new mexico?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
"it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. those w...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2020 18:23
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2020 18:23
Questions on the website: 13722361