In the case of schenck v. united states the supreme court ruled that.. a. the espionage act was unconstitutional. b. charles schenck had been falsely accused. c. speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned. d. the first amendment had no limits.

C. speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

Explanation:

Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer were two socialists who circulated pamphlets urging disobedience through peaceful action from the public because they understood that the draft during World War I infringed the Thirteenth Amendment ban on involuntary servitude. They were convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 by trying to create insubordination, and they appealed claiming that the Espionage Act violated the First Amendment. However, in Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court stated that it was a proper application of Congress’ wartime authority.

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric

julius caesar turned the roman republic into the roman empire by coming in and taking the "dictator" role during the time of a civil war (elites vs lower classes) winning battles and reputation, then declaring him dictator for life

hope this : )