History, 05.01.2020 01:31 Shamiyah732

Unlike liberal critics of roosevelt’s new deal, conservative critics
thought new deal programs did not do enough.
largely supported new deal programs as they were.
thought new deal programs expanded government too much.
supported government expansion of new deal programs.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: tilsendt

The answer to the question, is the third one. Not at all like liberal commentators of Roosevelt's New Deal, preservationist pundits thought New Deal programs extended government excessively. The New Deal was the arrangement of government projects propelled by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the wake of taking office in 1933, because of the disaster of the Great Depression, and enduring until American section into the Second World War in 1942.

Answer from: tsadface21

Unlike liberal critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal, conservative critics: thought New Deal programs expanded government too much. One negative impact of the new deal is that it make the citizen of united States became more dependent to the government. it may have solved short term problems during economic depression, but it will often lead to larger sinkhole into economic downfall in the future

Answer from: Quest

the book of ezekiel takes its title from the priest of the same name, son to a man named buzi. ezekiel’s priestly lineage shines through in his prophetic ministry; he often concerned himself with topics such as the temple, the priesthood, the glory of the lord, and the sacrificial system.

explanation: mark brainliesrt i am trying to get to the next level i will be your freind and

Answer from: Quest

because everyone tends to get their feelings hurt if they don't agree with something someone is doing and vice versa. it's a major issue that needs to be dealt with, especially in the christian society. everyone thinks that christians hate gay people, because it is a sin, and christians "just hate everyone who sins and every one is going to hell for sinning"(saying that all in a sarcastic tone but i'm just going to go ahead and tell you why everything with that type of view on christians is wrong.

#1. christians do not hate gay people. and if they do, then that is their own personal problem. christians are not supposed to hate anyone. if you hate a neighbor (or any person basically), then that is as if you are hating jesus.

#2. being gay is in fact a sin according to the holy bible. it is in genesis. and no, the fact that it is a sin, does not mean that god hates you. he is grieved that a person is sinning against his word, but he still loves that person. in fact, christians are supposed to love everyone. we are supposed to love our enemies, but hate the sin they are doing. we love you and respect you, but we do not agree with every decision you make, is basically what i'm trying to say.

hope this you ! (:

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 20:30

Why did the 24th amendment and the civil rights act succeed when other legislation had failed?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 23:00

Which scenario best illustrates the principle of popular sovereignty?

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 00:30

Germany italy and japan formed the tripartite pact in part because they: a. hoped to convince the united states to stay out of world war ii b. share the ruling philosophies based on communist economics c. resented the agreements they were forced to sign at the munich conference d. believed their territories were threatened by aggressive foreign states

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:00

Which is a result of the free exercise clause? parents can prevent their children from being vaccinated. people with a religious objection to military service cannot be drafted. businesses that sell religious materials can be open only on sundays. amish children do not have to attend school past the eighth grade.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Unlike liberal critics of roosevelt’s new deal, conservative critics
thought new deal programs...

Questions