In the supreme court’s decision in korematsu v. united states, the court said that korematsu was not a spy and deserved equal rights. was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights. was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately. was a spy but was free to go back to japan.

was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.

Korematsu v. the US was a court case where Korematsu sued the US for the detainment of him and the Japanese during World War II.

In the court decision, the Supreme Court decided that Korematsu was legally detained because it was a time of war. The executive order to detain and move the Japanese was upheld as constitutional because of the war powers clause. In a time of war, citizens are required to give up rights and that had been established in earlier wars as well. This was the sacrifice the Japanese had to give to protect the safety of the country.

In the Supreme Court’s decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately.

Further Explanation:

During World War II, the United States was at war with Japan. At that time, many Japanese Americans were residing in the country. Following Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, on 7th December 1941, the government issued an order to create exclusive military areas. Subsequently, internment camps were created, in which all people who were of Japanese descent, irrespective of whether or not they were aliens, were to be relocated. However, this was challenged by the 23-year old Japanese American, Fred Korematsu, on the grounds that it violated the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, under which no person “shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

However, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the government to hold people of Japanese descent, irrespective of whether or not they were American citizens, in the internment camps organized for them. It felt that, given the wartime situation with Japan at the time, it was absolutely indispensable to protect the American nation against espionage by Japan. This wartime necessity itself was far more important than the rights of Japanese Americans. From the viewpoint of the military, given the hostile scenario with Japan at that time, it was all but necessary that all American citizens of Japanese descent must be separated from the West Coast, as long as the war with Japan continued.

Learn more:

1. According to the supreme court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in edwards v. south carolina?

2. In the case Roe v. Wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws?

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Korematsu v. United States

Keywords: World War II, Japan, Pearl Harbor, Fred Korematsu, Fifth Amendment, Supreme Court .

isajfeidjseniewwkdfke yahya is the berds is dsa; f

savannahjax02 hand

one of the strengths of the united nations is their worldwide peacekeeping. they prevent conflict from escalating into war, try to reach agreements between the opposing sides, and bring war to an end as soon as possible. they also have a world food programme which is among the most effective food aid programmes worldwide. the united nations provides food and clean water to people in need, they also send money to strengthen the country's economy. the united nations also provides unaids, which is healthcare to hiv patients. they also raise funds to prevents aids/hivs and the spreads of others diseases. they also have campaigns that show how to protect from certain diseases. the united nations also has the unhcr, the united nations high commissioner for refugees, which is an aid to refugees. it them by raising funds to build up refugee camps or to improve housing and sanitary facilities. it also has many programmes to raise awareness about the refugee crisis and the needs of the refugees. the united nations high commissioner for refugees also builds schools in crisi regions and refugee camps. a major strength of the united nations is its efforts in elucidating the crisis from which it emerged. as such many of the issues which the world was confronted with in 1945 have been addressed. this can be seen with the organization’s mediatory efforts in resolving conflict in territories. intrinsically, particular reference can be observed in the cold war era 1947-1953 where the world was in a state of political and military tension between the powers of the western world led by the united states and the communist world led by the soviet union. as the world was divided east and west, capitalist and communist, us and ussr, the united nations had its first opportunities to establish its role as a mediator in the international system. moreover, the united nations was involved in the establishment of an israeli state on the eastern mediterranean coast. violence erupted between israeli forces and palestinians and their arab allies in response to the foundation of the state of israel. there has also been the promotion of democracy where the united nations has enabled people in many countries to participate in free and fair elections including those held in cambodia, namibia, el salvador and south africa. additionally, there has been the promotion of women’s rights, particularly in middle eastern countries, to have greater control over their lives. the united nations fund for women (unifem) have supported projects in improving the quality of life for women in over 100 countries including marketing opportunities, access to food production and so on.

however, despite these strengths there exist deep seated shortcomings of the organization in the contemporary world. notable of these is the fact that the world today is a different world than the epoch in which the united nations was born. at that time the issues facing the organization was the achievement of peace and security in a world of great powers, the insistence of the united states that the european powers should grant independence and self-government to their colonies and so on. nonetheless, some of these remain but many have changed. the world and its political atmosphere have undergone a massive transformation however the structures of the united nations have remain unchanged. these structures have failed to keep pace with the new demands which must be presently addressed. consequently, given these circumstances the united nations now faces increasing demand for change both in its institutions and in the subject matters of its concern. lastly, another weakness involves that of corruption and mismanagement. there have been reports of a cascade of scandals at the hands of the united nations. most notable of these is the wholesale corruption of the oil-for-food relief program in iraq, disappearance of united nations funds and the exposure of a transnational network of sexual misconduct by united nations peacekeepers in africa. to add, there have been political pressure, favoritism and cronyism plaguing appointments to united nations peace operations. as such it can be examined there exist a culture of impunity where the united nations operates with secrecy and is shielded by diplomatic immunity. consequently, it is no doubt that this result in institutional weakness and a staff that is less than ideally equipped to complete the required tasks. in essence, the united nations as an organization contains both pros and cons in its performance and functions. its strengths emphasizes its utmost importance in the international arena in terms of it neutral stance and mediator efforts however this is questionable when and examination of its weaknesses is undertaken.

word count: 769

mark brainliest