Do you think that halting warship construction was a sufficient step toward preventing another war

It depends on the war you're talking about. I think that just halting warship construction is not sufficient to show to other countries you're trying to avoid a war, once you have other war goods such as tanks, airplanes, guns and a powerful army. But when I say that it depends on the war, it is because in some cases, when a country wants to show that it will seek peace, traditionally that country will avoid producing some war goods. A good example is after World War I, when the countries, in order to avoid another conflict, they dealt to not produce some kind of war good.

Explanation:

a politically correct answer.

northernmost part (disputed, administered) - near indira col, siachen glacier - 35.674520°n 76.845245°e

northernmost part (disputed, claimed) - dafdar near beyik pass - 37°24′00″n 75°24′00″e

northernmost part (undisputed) - near dharwas, chambal district - 33.24902°n 76.82704°e

southernmost part (mainland) - cape comorin - 8.06890°n 77.55230°e

southernmost part - indira point in the nicobar islands - 6.74678°n 93.84260°e

distance between:  

1 & 4 - 3070 km

1 & 5 - 3654 km

2 & 4 - 3269 km

2 & 5 - 3885 km

3 & 4 - 2801 km

3 & 5 - 3430 km

explanation:

a

explanation: