What was a significant result of the nuremberg trials? many nations looked to their own military tactics and reduced their arsenals. many nations saw the need for a world government to maintain peace. it operated as a condemnation of totalitarianism and militarism. the leaders of the allies questioned their own methods of internment.

The correct answer is C) it operated as a condemnation of totalitarianism and militarism.

A significant result of the Nuremberg trials was that it operated as a condemnation of totalitarianism and militarism.

The Nuremberg trials were held in the city of Nuremberg, Germany, from 1946 to 1947. The Allied Force wanted to prosecute Nazi members, so they created these military tribunals. Judges from the United States, the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and France presided over the hearings of 21 Nazi elements. Due to the Nuremberg trials, the Nazis were held accountable for their actions. Twelve of them were sentenced to the death penalty.

either b) they were often feared and despised by other native cultures. or

c) their obsession allowed them to coexist with many other native cultures because of their peaceful nature.

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.