Which of the following resulted from the dred scott decision? a. dred scott remained a slave. b. the fugitive slave law was declared unconstitutional. c. a slave was ruled to be a non-citizen with no right to sue in federal court. d. freeing a slave against his master's wishes was ruled to be a violation of due process of law. e. the missouri compromise was declared unconstitutional. f. proslavery people were alarmed. the u. s. constitution appeared to support slavery.

F. Proslavery people were alarmed.

T. Freeing a slave against his master's wishes was ruled to be a violation of due process of law.

T. The Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional.

T. Dred Scott remained a slave.

F. The fugitive slave law was declared unconstitutional.

T. The U.S. Constitution appeared to support slavery.

T. A slave was ruled to be a non-citizen with no right to sue in federal court.

Hope this helps!

the answer is: the sesquicentennial of the american civil war is an occasion to consider the legacy of that great conflict. this legacy is our inheritance, and despite many indelible features, we continue to negotiate the resolution of that conflict. the civil war was fought over slavery, but not always on behalf of slaves

idk lol i just wanna finish mines