subject
History, 28.07.2019 23:20 oreonb11

Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. they would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. for why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? quote by: alexander hamilton answer choices: a: hamilton is a federalist and reasons that adding a list of rights to the constitution would cause problems later. b: hamilton is a federalist and reasons that the constitution should not be ratified without a specific list of rights. c: hamilton is an anti-federalist and reasons that adding a list of rights to the constitution would cause problems later. d: hamilton is an anti-federalist and reasons that the constitution should not be ratified without a specific list of rights.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:50
How did philip ii view the religious rights of protestant citizens in his empire
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
In what way did expansion and global trade during the 15th to 18th centuries affect the economies of european countries?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Which number shows the location of the united kingdom of great britain?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
As the result of a conflict between british troops and a colonial militia in massachusetts
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are conte...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.01.2021 18:50
question
Mathematics, 23.01.2021 18:50
question
Mathematics, 23.01.2021 18:50
Questions on the website: 13722367