Which of the following correctly describes the federalists' argument that having three branches of government protected the people? (3 points) the branches would be responsible for drafting a list of rights to include in the constitution. the branches were unable to create laws that would be enforced at the state level. the branches would represent the former state governments at the national level. the branches were equal in power so that no one branch could control the others.

Short and simple the answer is D

Explanation:

        i'm fairly sure that the correct answers are 2 and 3.

        i used both my knowledge of world history and the process of elimination to obtain these answers. option 1 cannot be a possible selection because the mandate of heaven belongs to ancient chinese philosophical belief. option 4 sounds like it would benefit the region than detriment it. however, both 2 and 3 explain a potential reason for what could have contributed to the fall of the roman empire.

      hope this ! if i were you, i'd get a second opinion, because i haven't taken this course for a year. best of luck!

***websites that me understand the curriculum better last year are and ***

treating native americans justly and giving them equal rights as citizens of the united states" was not a way in which americans sought to solve the indian problem. removal was the most popular idea.