Why did the dred scott decision case increase the sectional tensions between the north and the south?

The North contemplated it has evidence that the federal government were corrupted or utilizing over the "slave potential." a minimum of no longer actively anti-slavery or Presidents tended to be professional-slavery, the Senate replaced into held hostage by utilising professional-slavery Senators, and the living house replaced into impotent, as slave states have been overrepresented in Congress subsequently of counting slaves as 3/5 of a guy or woman for determining how many Representatives that state have been given in the living house. At an analogous time as the Republican Party surged in potential, The Democratic Party began to fracture between Northern and Southern Democrats, culminating in Abraham Lincoln's victory in the 1860 election that sparked the Civil conflict.

overtime, the civil rights movement changed in a way that not only it benefited african-americans, but benefited other ethnicity's such as latinos, asians, or women too! that's why the results of the movement be called mixed.

the civil rights movement brought about tremendous changes. no longer were blacks denied the right to vote, to eat, shop, and swim where they , and more importantly, to attend integrated schools. despite its many accomplishments, however, the civil rights movement had its shortcomings. for example, many people, both young and old, lost their lives, homes, jobs, and families. still other individuals were so damaged by psychological trauma that they ceased being productive members of the community. the movement left intact the economic inequities that had contributed to the maintenance of segregation. and finally, racism remained alive and well long after the movement's end. like most movements of its kind, the civil rights movement left behind a mixed legacy of triumph and tragedy.