Why would americans view the compromise of 1850 as a final solution to the sectional controversy that began with the wilmot proviso in 1846?

The compromise of 1850 was referred to as the final solution as it restricted a system of making slaves states in the nation.

The Southern states were in favor of slavery states while the North was opposing this rule. Wilmot Proviso was the one who started a protest against slavery states by bringing a compromise of 1850, which made California a free state. California was occupied after the completion of the Mexican-American War, which increased the US territory along with the abolishment of the slavery system from that state.

It was achieved by fugitive laws and provided voting rights but the restricted movement of people from north to south regions. Therefore, the balance was achieved at the cost of violence between the North and South regions.

Learn more about the compromise of 1850  here:

link

can i know the options so i can answer the qu

explanation:

a trial judge has broad powers in his courtroom. the judge's decision is usually final for the duration of the trial, and the party's one special type of witness is an expert witness.