Question text jake was recently arrested for vagrancy after a policeman found him sleeping in a public park. after a month, jake still has not been brought in front of a judge to hear the charges against him. which of jake's rights listed below have been violated in this scenario? select one: a. habeas corpus b. peaceable assembly c. free speech d. ex post facto

The correct answer is A. Habeas corpus

Explanation:

In law and related fields, Habeas corpus refers to a principle that establishes all individuals that are arrested should be taken to a judge to guarantee their detention is lawful which means there are reasons or evidence that the individual committed and crime and the process of detention follow the law. In the same way, an individual might be released in the case the habeas corpus principle is not followed.

In the case of Jake, habeas corpus has been violated because despite he was arrested, he has not been brought in front of a judge that guarantees the detention was lawful, and Jake committed a crime or offense which is part of Habeas corpus principle.

the answer is false.

1) the andrew carniage's purchase and renovation of skibo castle have been very good and auspicious for the local people of dornoch firth, scotland because this is a turistic attraction for many people who would want to know the castle, the local people would take advantage about this.

2) yes, it could.