History, 18.07.2019 05:10 micro7909

The three- fifths compromise vs. the great compromise

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

The 3/5ths compromise was that every 3 slaves out of 5 in the south counted as a vote. The Great Compromise was a matter of votes, the bigger states wanted their vote to be based on population, while the smaller states wanted everyone to have the same amount. The compromise was the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Answer from: hammackkatelyn60

I assume your question is a compare/contrast sort of question.

Compare: Both measures dealt with the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Contrast: The Great Compromise was about small states vs. large states. The Three-Fifths Compromise resolved a difference between slave states and non-slave states.

Explanation:

The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.

Answer from: Quest

Sorry sir you did not give us the graph i typically but i'm very confused my conclusion is you're missing valuable information in the question

Answer from: Quest

1. explain aspects of the democratic process as it was developed in ancient athens

2. trace the roots of the americans political process to ancient athens

3. explain the relationship of citizens to the political process

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 21:10

Interest groups are protected by the first amendment guarantees of petition. and what other freedom?

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 22:30

One of the observations by someone who was present for roosevelt's speech was, "its clarity, logic, and sincerity struck us." quote one example from the text that you would describe as clear, logical, or sincere. explain the language in your chosen quote correctly, and tell why it can be considered clear, logical, or sincere.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 22:50

The term globalization is best defined as: a. a reduction in the political and military power of imperial countries over their colonies. b. an increasing interaction among citizens and businesses of countries around the world. c. the spread of philosophies based on the right of all nations to political independence. d. the establishment of international laws protecting all people's human and civil rights.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 23:00

What did jesuits and the leaders of the council of trent have in common? they wanted to improve relations with protestants by making compromises. they were opposed to improving spirituality within the catholic faith. they accused people of heresy and witchcraft. they were concerned with improving religious education.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

The three- fifths compromise vs. the great compromise...

Questions