Asap! fiscal conservatism is the belief that government should not have large debts, and that government programs should not be paid for on borrowed money. how could both democrats and republicans be considered fiscally conservative? republicans—spending money on new programs. democrats—tax cuts for the wealthy republicans—cutting government programs. democrats—raising taxes on the wealthy republicans—raising taxes on the wealthy. democrats—cutting existing government programs republicans—tax cuts for the wealthy. democrats—funding new programs

The correct answer is B. Republicans—cutting government programs. Democrats—raising taxes on the wealthy

Explanation:

In the politics of the U.S. and during its history, the two political parties have been and are the Republican and the Democrat party, each one with their own features. In general terms, the Republicans are conservative, believe the state should not intervene on market and support the individual over the community. On the other hand, Democrats are left-leaning, support the intervention of the state and support government and other programs that help the community.

Similarly, in terms of taxes and economy and therefore in terms of fiscal conservatism both parties are quite different, while Democrats believe people with more income or wealthy people should have higher taxes and the military fund should be decreased to fund programs and avoid borrowing money. Republicans believe this can be achieved this is to stop funding government programs because they do not support this type of programs. Considering this, it can be concluded both Democrats and Republicans can be considered fiscally conservative as Republicans support cutting government programs to avoid government debts and Democrats believe the way to do this is raising taxes on the wealthy.

he armenian genocide, also known as the armenian holocaust, was the ottoman government's systematic extermination of 1.5 million armenians, mostly citizens within the ottoman empire.

explanation:

in his book, the riddle of the rosetta stone, james giblin talks about how there was a young british polymath and physician named thomas young who made a lot of advances on the deciphering of the rosetta stone. he says that even though young made a lot of mistakes because he was working under false assumptions, he also made huge contributions like deciphering three out of the seven symbols (more than anyone else before him). young published his findings and continued his good work but he wasn't able to progress much further due to some unfavorable situations, he still laid the basis for many other scholars and of course for the man who has been generally known to have deciphered it, jean-françois champollion