subject
History, 14.07.2019 10:30 25cotahai

The is the process in which the political party that controlled the state or federal government would fire the supporters of the other party and hire its own partisans instead. the is a united states federal law, enacted in 1883, which established that positions within the federal government should be awarded on the basis of merit instead of political affiliation. brainliest reward

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:50
Will have the greatest effect on human health. pollution in the a. troposphere b. stratosphere mesosphere d. thermosphere
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
The irish and germans of the 1840's were part of the new immigration. true or false
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Which 19th century technological advancement would best allow farmers along the mississippi river in iowa to quickly transport their crops to buyers in louisiana?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The is the process in which the political party that controlled the state or federal government wo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2019 17:50
Questions on the website: 13722363