The federalists favored the constitution as the basis of a new government because they a.) wanted a military government. b.) thought the federal government should remain weak c.) wanted a strong central government. d.)believed the new government should have one branch.

Option C, wanted a strong central government.

Explanation:

The Federalists coveted a powerful government and stable executive branch, whereas, the Anti-Federalists coveted a flimsier central government. The Federalists opposed the provision of the Bill of Rights due to the reason that the new constitution was adequate. In other words, they argued that they do not need the Bills of Right since the state and the people kept any authorities not granted to the federal government. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists obliged a Bill of Rights. because the people and the states kept

i believe the answer would be 1.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.